CSS Flexible Box Layout Level 3 Disposition of Comments for 2015-05-14 LCWD

Last call document: http://www.w3.org/TR/2015/WD-css-flexbox-1-20150514/

Editor's draft: http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css-flexbox-1/

The following color coding convention is used for comments:

Open issues are marked like this

An issue can be closed as Accepted, OutOfScope, Invalid, Rejected, or Retracted. Verified indicates commentor's acceptance of the response.

Issue 1. #
Summary:  min/max-content sizes of flex containers incorrectly defined
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55D6D14A.3010202@inkedblade.net
Response: 
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 2. #
Summary:  Should min/max-content sizes of flex containers include flex-basis?
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55D6D14A.3010202@inkedblade.net
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Sep/0007.html
Closed:   Retracted
Resolved: [Paris F2F]
Issue 3. #
Summary:  Can percentages resolve given min-size: auto?
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/54F4FC19.2050909@mozilla.com
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0205.html
Open:     Action on dholbert, msft, and blink teams to discuss and decide something
Resolved: [Paris F2F]
Issue 4. #
Summary:  Quirks mode percentage size resolution, 'flex: 1', and intrinsic heights
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPTJ0XEFH7FP92BjHY8r7VTRQgab8oO-zOL=6QO=ZpfH9Dk-Pw@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0232.html
Closed:   Invalid
Issue 5. #
Summary:  Impact of align-items on abspos items inconsistent with css-align
From:     Christian Biesinger
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CAPTJ0XHb621NNGJkjEAeJXuS2DwqN_eHJbbZUVeh+FbNWZTiPw@mail.gmail.com
Open
Issue 6. #
Summary:  Do flex item determination before anonymous box fixup.
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/55A95E05.8040208@inkedblade.net
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: [Paris F2F]
Issue 7. #
Summary:  Clarify % margin/padding behavior
From:     Daniel Holbert
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/5596BE4F.5010306@mozilla.com
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 8. #
Summary:  Add a11y requirments to authoring tools
From:     fantasai
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/5580BF2D.7080908@inkedblade.net
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0348.html
Open:     =WG= Needs WG resolution.
Issue 9. #
Summary:  Editorial Comments 
From:     timeless
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CACsW8eE7eRghUk8g+LdVxFR-gHpZFO=EAAsGk=M-nqoG9eUT_w@mail.gmail.com
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CACsW8eG7gOiNps=b_b8iUMLxNxnjVXu9_2qhk9mHaCgY_b0Vrg@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0344.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0346.html
Closed:   Accepted
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 10. #
Summary:  Broken Styling
From:     Ryan Prichard
Comment:  http://www.w3.org/mid/CA+gYnHRp6RC4OECQTicZGSGB_Rq=x+3O8P3mVD=gCY+g0u8EoA@mail.gmail.com
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Jun/0027.html
Closed:   Accepted
Note:     Bug appears to have disappeared?
Resolved: Editorial
Issue 11. #
Summary:  Blink objects to percentage-margin change
From:     Tab Atkins Jr.
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0521.html
Note:     Accepting this reversal will require a corresponding change to Grid.
Open
Issue 12. #
Summary:  Intrinsic Cross size of flex container totally wrong
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0253.html
Open:     Need corrected text
Resolved: Bugfix
Issue 13. #
Summary:  Errors in Intrinsic Main Size determination
From:     fantasai
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0212.html
Closed:   Accepted
Open:     Need to discuss biesi's concerns about this section as a whole
Issue 14. #
Summary:  Use first available baseline instead of first item's baseline
From:     timeless
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0345.html
Open
Issue 15. #
Summary:  Add a tab-order property
From:     Bo Campbell
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0285.html
Response: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Aug/0347.html
Closed:   Rejected
Issue 16. #
Summary:  Are abspos whose containing block is flexbox affected by % resolution change?
From:     Mats Palmgren
Comment:  https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015May/0154.html
Open:     Depends on issue #11
Note:     WG appears to lean towards consistency within grid/flex over consistency within abspos